thinking about archaeology

Posts tagged “Harold St George Gray

A surprising and charming Avebury discovery

Avebury Underhill.jpg

Long ago when I was curator of the museum in Avebury, I came across a pencil sketch in the museum in Devizes that showed a section through the great henge bank around Avebury’s stone circle. It’s an extraordinary document of an excavation in 1894, that was never published at the time. Something quite unexpected has come to light that seems to show us a little more of this important, but mysterious dig.

We have two records, the first being an account of a tour by the Wiltshire Archaeological Society to Avebury in 1903, nearly a decade later. Lord Avebury had promised to be there but was too busy in parliament, so they had to settle for the Reverend Goddard. He told the party that some years before, Mr Trepplin had dug a section through the bank and the ditch for Sir Henry Meux, then owner of Avebury Manor. He refers to deer horns, British pottery and worked bone, and that’s about it. Harold St George Gray quoted this in 1935 when he was describing his own excavations, but he has much more detail, including measurements. Critically Gray describes “what appeared to be the grass surface line of an inner rampart, defined by a curved band of vegetable mould.” Where did he get this? He had the “rough diary” of Mr Thomas Leslie, who, he says, actually supervised the work.


I was looking for this diary (without success) when I found the sketch in Devizes. I redrew it in ink for Hengeworld, where I emphasised the significance of the buried turf line: it is top right, above, with Gray’s schematic ditch section on the left and the two combined as a single section at bottom right. It seems to show a clear, lengthy break in time between a lower bank and the present one, which hides a smaller version within. A reasonable assumption would be that the extended bank was achieved by digging an existing ditch deeper, meaning the radiocarbon dates that we have for antler picks from the ditch probably date the extension, not the original earthwork. Which means for now we can only guess when the original was built.

There would be enormous gains from re-excavating Leslie’s trench, a relatively simple task (involving a lot of shoring!).

Anyway, Gray could see where the trench had been, and mapped its location. You can still see it today, a slight but distinct depression in the bank occasionally picked out by varied plant growth. Recently I saw an online archive of photos and hand-painted glass slides at the ADS, created originally by HMJ Underhill and depicting the “Megalithic Monuments of Great Britain,” dating to 1897–1905. To my great surprise, among them are two images that almost certainly show Leslie’s bank trench, as a white stripe in the distance.. They were, according to the archive records, made in 1895 (the photo) and November 15–18, 1895 (the painting): the year after the excavation. I’ve put a white disc above each image where the trench crests the top of the bank.

Who knows what else might turn up?

Peter Lord talks to British Archaeology about Early Man

Peter Lord.jpgThe new British Archaeology has three great exclusives. I’ve already written briefly about two of them: new discoveries at Stonehenge, and some Roman pans buried with flowers which were preserved by the corroding bronze. Here’s the third. Last year I went to Bristol to talk to Peter Lord, co-founder of Aardman. We talked about archaeology, imaginary worlds and Aardman’s next film, Early Man.


Screengrab from Early Man website

We have every reason, on Aardman’s and director Nick Park’s track records, to expect this movie to be immensely popular. There aren’t enough archaeologists in the world to make a statistically significant difference to the audience, even if every one of them went to see it (or indeed if they all boycotted it). But I think most archaeologists will love it. A sort of ancient Britain with echoes of One Million Years BC, the Beano and Ealing comedy, Early Man will at last offer the chance for them to get enthusiastic about a film that doesn’t feature Indiana Jones. Peter Lord was a lovely host, chatting away while he modelled a clay figure.

BA153 Lant St.jpgThe magazine also feature five major excavations, from the Calanais megaliths on the Isle of Lewis, to a Roman town in Norfolk with an unusual story, and early medieval natives, immigrants and changing times in north-east Scotland – Portmahomack.

BA153 Gray.jpgI particularly enjoyed working with Alison Jane Hoare on her article about the Victorian/Edwardian archaeologist Harold St George Gray. He’s familiar to a handful of archaeologists for his work with General Pitt Rivers, and later his own excavations of neolithic sites. But he really deserves to be more widely known, and as the feature shows, there is an interesting life (with a personal tragedy) we hear little about – and there remains a story to be told. He was an extraordinary photographer, as I discovered when I arrived as curator of Avebury Museum in 1979, only a little after the National Trust had brought it Gray’s archaeological archive on a stone circles project. With the help of the National Trust and staff in Avebury Museum, I put together a portfolio of some of his photos for the magazine, most of them never published before.

With all the usual stuff, including photographer Mick Sharp’s new column and the annual Requiem feature, there’s a lot to read in the first British Archaeology of 2017.