thinking about archaeology

Archive for March, 2016

For Zaha Hadid

Bowood.jpg

I was sitting outside the Robert Adam Orangery at Bowood House looking across Capability Brown’s lake, a lovely spring day, warm in the sun, chill in the breeze ruffling the daffodils, when my phone caught the news of Zaha Hadid’s death in Miami.

The works of accomplished visionaries down the centuries shape our lives .


Here’s why I think that Stonehenge photo is fake

Yesterday I blogged a photo that won the British Life Photography Awards 2015. It was a striking image of dawn at Stonehenge, captured on a field of camera phones. There was something odd about it though: as I noted in parenthesis at the end, “why do I have a faint wonder if it’s been Photoshopped?”

I had a closer look at it last night. It may be real. But I think the photographer, and the award, need to prove it. There are too many things with the image that don’t seem right.

Here are some recent views of the same event.

screenshot 1.jpg

The above image is a still from a video on the Guardian website, published in June last year. The video shows a typical recent scene at Stonehenge as the sun rises on the midsummer solstice dawn.

Here is another screenshot from the same video.

screenshot 2.jpg

Here is a photo taken on the same day, published by the Telegraph:

Stonehenge_Summer__3348745b.jpg

And finally a photo taken at the same event in 2010. This was published by the Daily Mail:

article-1288255-0A20CE7D000005DC-707_964x492.jpg

What do we see? Overall, the British Life Photography Awards picture (BLP) has a quite different look about it. It shows a relatively monochrome view of people crammed together all apparently holding up phones at a similar height (see the crop below). None of the other photos shows this. We see a lot of phones, but most people are not taking photographs. The crowd is more varied and colourful (note how the colour in the sky is reflected in the foreground, which doesn’t seem to be the case with the BLP image). If you look in particular at the BLP hands, light seems to be coming from a variety of directions, which is odd as there should be no direct light on the back of the hands at all.

2015-winner-51920 crop.jpg

cameras.jpg

Most significantly, I think, as with the BLP image, in the press images above we can see pictures on phone screens. But they are not all identical (see a selection in the lower row above). They show different views, as we would expect, and the clarity depends on the type of phone and the angle of the phone relative to the camera that shot the photo. In the BLP image the cameras all show an almost identical shot, the same view, the same light, and all extremely clear (look at the highest phone on the left: is that really the view that would have been seen from that point?). There’s no depth in the image. It has something of the manic impact of a John Heartfield photomontage, but it’s not a straight photo. It’s a clever desktop composition.

Why does this matter? Could we be seeing a new Heartfield in the making? That would be good, the world needs more satirists.

The BLP Awards is a website competition, with an impressive list of judges, including Chris Steele-Perkins and David Yeo. It’s cheap to enter (you can submit three images for £10, and up to a total of 40). The entry requirements are simple and open, and encourage phone images. This is the second year of the awards, and it comes with the second book… which has the Stonehenge image on the cover:

2015-BLPA-Portfolio-2-cover.jpg

There are submission guidelines. They include this:

Not permitted:

Physical changes e.g. adding or removing objects, people; or stripping in sky from another image etc.

Digital collages, sandwich shots and composites.

The rules allow “digital adjustments” (“Minor cleaning work including removal of sensor spots and dust, moderate adjustments of: contrast, tonal values…” etc). But the winning 2015 image seems to me to go well beyond such tinkering. If so, whatever we think of it, someone else should have won.

Elena Marimon Munoz appears to be a student at the Centre for Digital Entertainment, working on image acquisition and image enhancement in digital radiography. She clearly knows a thing or two about digital imaging. But was her entry to the BLP Awards fair?


Brilliant winner of British Life Photography award

2015-winner-51920.jpgVisiting Stonehenge at midsummer over the years has been an experience of time passing, marked by portable camera technology. The worst year was when video cameras with side viewers were in fashion, you looked over a forest of hands raising up the blank gadgets which no one could see into. What works so well here is that the large electronic viewing screens show the view, with most of the photographers trying to get the stones without the crowd: taking all that trouble and ending up by not recording what’s in front of them (and doubtless having fun while doing it). A great shot by Elena Marimon Munoz. (Though why do I have a faint wonder if it’s been photoshopped?).

British Life Photography can be seen at the Mall Galleries, London March 7– 13 March, and Banbury Museum March 25–July 9

Below: The Kodachrome days

Stonehenge Mike PItts.jpg

 


Great to hear Phyllida Barlow will be at 2017 Venice Biennale

Her dock at Tate Britain in 2014 said more about us and ruins than the ill-conceived exhibition Ruin Lust next door. As I left the press view of the show, which seemed to have just found a theme which could have been more interestingly explored, men were rigging up dock in the Duveen Galleries. The juxtaposition of random debris and classical formality, all on a grand scale, was wonderful and uplifting. It was at once collapsing and rising, new construction shuttering masquerading as decayed antiquity. You wanted to linger in its jagged corners, climb over it.

I took these photos with my phone, one of those moments when I really wished I had the Nikon with me.

IMG_1065IMG_1062IMG_1059IMG_1061IMG_1063