What made Stonehenge so interesting in the 1870s?

I’ve just discovered Google’s Ngram, which is fun to play with. It will search for words and phrases within a million scanned books. This is what it did with “prehistory” and “Stonehenge”. “Prehistoric” first appeared in print in English in 1851, and you can see a steady spread here of the use of “prehistory”. (If you graph “prehistoric”, the rise is even more dramatic, starting in 1860 and reaching a plateau around 1920, but it dwarfs the Stonehenge graph into a low wobble – these lines express the relative use of words to the entire lexicon, and are said to be most reliable between 1800 and 2000.)

Stonehenge has a more interesting graph. I’d guess the 1810s peak is connected to the excavations around Stonehenge in the early 19th century, not least by people like Cunnington and Colt Hoare. The 60s peak would fit the huge interest generated first by Richard Atkinson (his Stonehenge came out in 1956 and was paperbacked by Penguin in 1960) and then Gerald Hawkins (Stonehenge Decoded was first published in 1965).

But what’s that peak in the 1870s? Petrie? Darwin? A surge in visitors after the London train reached Salisbury in 1857? (But if that, why was it slow to start and did it then fall off?) Any ideas?


5 thoughts on “What made Stonehenge so interesting in the 1870s?

  1. Noticeable decline after Antrobus put the fences up in 1901, but this is odd as there must have been ‘000’s of soldiers in the area training for WWI.

  2. But did those soldiers write books? It may be significant that the 1870s peak, unlike the others, seems to be something of a trend up before, and down after (rather than a sudden rise and fall)so may indicate something bigger.

  3. In the late 1860s/early 70s there was the proposed excavation of Stonehenge by a Committee of the British Association (the one that didn’t happen because of opposition from the landowner). Pitt-Rivers was heavily involved, collecting some objects & publishing on the site (see http://bit.ly/HkfMxM). I don’t know how much of an impact this failed venture had on public awareness of Stonehenge, but perhaps it’s an avenue worth exploring?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s